• Diversified UA
  • Posts
  • Taking Strategic Long Shots in UA: Why Playing It Safe Is the Riskiest Move of All

Taking Strategic Long Shots in UA: Why Playing It Safe Is the Riskiest Move of All

The growth ceiling isn’t your budget—it’s your mindset.

Incremental optimization keeps you efficient.

Strategic long shots make you grow.

In user acquisition (UA), small wins—tweaking bids, refining ad copy, adjusting lookalikes—add up. But over time, if those are the only moves you’re making, they start to work against you.

The biggest risk in growth today isn’t over-spending.

It’s under-thinking.

What Is a Strategic Long Shot in UA?

A strategic long shot is a deliberate, high-impact bet that changes how you approach growth.

It’s not a gamble—it’s a calculated move with clear rationale and defined upside.

Examples:

• Launching a new channel (e.g., CTV, OEMs, influencer-based UA)

• Reallocating 30%+ of budget from Meta to programmatic

• Changing your KPI focus from ROAS to incrementality or LTV payback

• Replacing your MMP or attribution model to unlock clearer insights

Why Strategic Long Shots Are Non-Negotiable

1. They Deliver Step-Change Learning

Minor optimizations yield marginal improvements.

Strategic long shots either work—or teach you something that transforms your playbook.

The faster you learn what actually drives growth, the more efficiently you scale.

2. They Help You Escape Diminishing Returns

If your Meta CPIs are creeping up or your Google ROAS is flatlining—it’s not a creative issue.

It’s a channel ceiling.

Strategic long shots let you tap into new audiences, new formats, and new margin dynamics before your competition does.

3. They Create Moats

Most teams won’t test what’s unfamiliar.

That’s exactly why you should.

Whether it’s programmatic DSPs, rewarded engagement traffic, or OEM inventory—pioneering channels becomes a competitive advantage when everyone else is still defaulting to Meta/Google.

Why Most Teams Avoid Them

Short-term incentives kill strategic thinking

If you’re judged by this week’s ROAS, you won’t test what takes 60 days to prove.

Budget fear

Most apps are already overspending in underperforming channels.

Reallocation isn’t risk—it’s responsibility.

Lack of internal alignment

If your CFO doesn’t understand the value of experimentation, every bold test looks like a mistake.

How to Execute a Strategic Long Shot Without Blowing It Up

1. Start with a Clear Hypothesis

“If we shift 20% of Meta budget to OEM ads, we’ll reach a lower-CPI, higher-retention segment.”

2. Back It with Data or Directional Signals

Market trends, pilot test data, peer benchmarks, or competitor moves.

3. Use the ICE Framework

Score each idea by Impact, Confidence, and Effort. Prioritize accordingly.

4. Plan the Measurement Window

Define what success looks like—and how long it’ll take to see it.

5. Pre-align Leadership

Get CMO/CFO buy-in before launch. Set expectations around testing, not guaranteed wins.

Strategic Long Shots You’ll Need to Make Soon

Move beyond Meta/Google

Channel concentration is a liability. Start diversifying now.

Shift toward incrementality

Optimizing for ROAS alone blinds you. Incremental revenue tests give the full picture.

Level up creative strategy

As algorithms handle more bidding, your narrative becomes your edge.

Bottom Line

Safe strategies are already priced in.

The apps that win are the ones that test aggressively, learn fast, and operate from first principles.

If your team isn’t running at least one strategic long shot each quarter, you’re leaving growth on the table—and giving the edge to someone else.

What’s your next strategic long shot?

Found this valuable?

Subscribe to danielavshalom.me/subscribe for more high-leverage UA strategy each week.